-
Recent Posts
- Duke’s Proposed Mandatory Fee: Unjust and Bad Energy Policy
- Every Family in SC Pays Taxes: The Poorest Pay a Larger Share of Their Income than Wealthiest
- Columbia’s Ballpark Study: Ask the Wrong Questions and You’ll Get the Wrong Answers
- Look at the Net Effect of Economic Development Investments
- Does Building a Public Ballpark Make Sense for Columbia?
Archives
Categories
Meta
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on Twitter
- @LynnSTeague 2006 ACT 388; 2007 Base Load Review Act. A great couple of years for really, really bad laws. 4 months ago
- @FromPhDtoLife Executive Secretary, Illinois AAUP 4 months ago
- RT @AppleseedSC: Expanding Medicaid in South Carolina will not just get thousands of uninsured people healthcare—new generous provisions in… 5 months ago
- RT @JoeBReporter: The SC AARP is backing Gov. McMaster's call to prioritize seniors receiving the vaccine: "More than 95% of the deaths nat… 5 months ago
- @LynnSTeague Earmarks can lubricate the budget process in beneficial ways. They don’t need to be secret and the rec… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 7 months ago
Blogroll
Tag Archives: Low-Income
Duke’s Proposed Mandatory Fee: Unjust and Bad Energy Policy
Duke Energy is trying to triple the mandatory fee that South Carolinian’s Duke customers pay before they use the first kilowatt of electricity. Duke Energy filed significant rate increase requests with the Public Service Commission that will: a) hit particularly … Continue reading
